Skip to content Skip to navigation

Weaker teachers leaving schools under NYC's tenure changes (quotes Susanna Loeb)

June 15, 2014
Education Week
A recent study by GSE professor Susanna Loeb suggests a link between more rigorous tenure process and a rise in less-effective teachers leaving the field in NYC.
By 
Stephen Sawchuk

After New York City encouraged principals to be more deliberative in awarding tenure, ineffective teachers were more likely to leave schools or the profession voluntarily—to the benefit of students, according to a recently released working paper. 

Even though the overall percentage of teachers actually denied tenure did not change much, the more-rigorous process appears to have reshaped the workforce—suggesting that changes in practice rather than underlying tenure laws, may bear fruit, said Susanna Loeb, a Stanford University professor and one of the study's authors. 

'Within current tenure laws, there's quite a bit of flexibility that districts aren't using in order to improve their workforce. This did not require a change in the law; it simply required a change in practice,' Loeb said. 'It wasn't necessarily greeted warmly by everyone involved, but you didn't need a court case or legislative change to change practice, and I think that's true in a number of places.'

See the full story in Education Week, and examine the working paper of Professor Leob's study.

Susanna Loeb is the Barnett Family Professor at Stanford Graduate School of Education and faculty director of the Center for Education Policy Analysis.

Back to the Top