Skip to content Skip to navigation

Poor kids who do everything right don't do better than rich kids who do everything wrong ( cites Sean Reardon)

October 18, 2014
Washington Post
In an article that comments on the effects of inequality on income opportunities later in life, Sean Readon comments on an educational 'arms race' that front loads affluent kids with opportunities to develop before school starts.
By 
Matt O'Brien

America is the land of opportunity, just for some more than others.

That's because, in large part, inequality starts in the crib. Rich parents can afford to spend more time and money on their kids, and that gap has only grown the past few decades. Indeed, economists Greg Duncan and Richard Murnane calculate that, between 1972 and 2006, high-income parents increased their spending on "enrichment activities" for their children by 151 percent in inflation-adjusted terms, compared to 57 percent for low-income parents.

But, of course, it's not just a matter of dollars and cents. It's also a matter of letters and words. Affluent parents talk to their kids three more hours a week on average than poor parents, which is critical during a child's formative early years. That's why, as Stanford professor Sean Reardonexplains, "rich students are increasingly entering kindergarten much better prepared to succeed in school than middle-class students," and they're staying that way.

It's an educational arms race that's leaving many kids far, far behind.

Read the full story in the Washington Post.

Sean Reardon is a professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Education. He is a member of the Center for Education Policy Analysis at Stanford. 

Back to the Top